Given the fact that with a long enough period of no daylight water returns to a body of Ice, is the following statement in error? "Genesis verse 1 to Verse 3" And as God moved over the waters of the deep he commanded, Let there be light.

Question

Given the fact that with a long enough period of no daylight water returns to a body of Ice, is the following statement in error? "Genesis verse 1 to Verse 3" And as God moved over the waters of the deep he commanded, Let there be light.

Poll Results

Use Poll in Facebook Messenger:

Click here to share poll on specific pages, user profiles or purchase votes!

Answer 1

I see a huge problem - as a body of water is not physically possible until enough time has lapsed for the sunlight to have the Ice being Waters of the deep,

Answer 2

I don't see what the problem is - and what is claimed is exactly as stated,

Peter John Schoen

Given the fact that with a long enough period of no daylight water returns to a body of Ice, is the following statement in error? "Genesis verse 1 to Verse 3" And as God moved over the waters of the deep he commanded, Let there be light.

Popular:

Recent:

Peter John Schoen

Given the fact that with a long enough period of no daylight water returns to a body of Ice, is the following statement in error? "Genesis verse 1 to Verse 3" And as God moved over the waters of the deep he commanded, Let there be light.

Popular:

Recent:

Please like this