+ Create Poll
Examples
Pricing
HELP
+ Create Poll
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Examples
Pricing
HELP
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Create a Poll
Emory Law class 2013 Case Opinions
follow
0
Emory Law class 2013 Case Opinions
Settings
Promote Poll
follow
0
 
Create Poll
United States v. Barker
Wilkey is righty (Barker had a good faith defense along with a reasonable but incorrect theory that Hunt could authorize this)
Merhige concurrence (MPC S2.04(3)(b) defends Barker -- a mistake by relying on a person charged with the enforcement of the law)
Leventhal's dissent (only the AG or Pres can authorize this search that is the law, this was a mistake of law and is not excepted by MPC Sec2.02(9))
Concur with the majority
Concur with the dissent
Share my opinion
Results
Share
Embed
Set the width
and height
Copy the code below to your page:
Emory Law class 2013 Case Opinions: United States v. Barker
created by
Poll
Poll
Results
Use Poll in Facebook Messenger:
Click here to share poll on specific pages, user profiles or purchase votes!
Popular:
Recent:
Please like this
Only fans of
can vote, "like" it here:
or go to the page, like it and submit your vote again