+ Create Poll
Examples
Pricing
HELP
+ Create Poll
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Examples
Pricing
HELP
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Create a Poll
MichaelJohn Swassing
follow
0
MichaelJohn Swassing
Settings
Promote Poll
follow
0
Create Poll
Is redefining the pack the best way to improve the current no-jam strategies?
Yes - Rewriting WFTDA Rule 4.1.1 which presently reads: "The pack is defined by the largest group of in bounds Blockers, skating in proximity, containing members from both teams" is the best place to address the issue of no-start jams.
No - Rewriting WFTDA Rule 4.1.1 is NOT the way to proceed in improving the current no-start jam issue, and I'll tell you why, and what is the best way in the comments. (Given that the issue of whether to address this in a rules change or not is taken up i
Share my opinion
Results
Share
Embed
Set the width
and height
Copy the code below to your page:
<iframe src="https://fans.vote/embed/ABRFJqWi4SA/michaeljohn-swassing-is-redefining-the-pack-the-best-way-to-improve-the-current-no-jam-strategies" width="800" height="300" frameborder="0"> <a href="https://fans.vote/vote/ABRFJqWi4SA/michaeljohn-swassing-is-redefining-the-pack-the-best-way-to-improve-the-current-no-jam-strategies"> MichaelJohn Swassing: Is redefining the pack the best way to improve the current no-jam strategies?</a> created by <a href="https://fans.vote">Poll</a> </iframe>
Poll
Results
Use Poll in Facebook Messenger:
Click here to share poll on specific pages, user profiles or purchase votes!
Popular:
Recent:
Please like this
Only fans of
can vote, "like" it here:
or go to the page, like it and submit your vote again