+ Create Poll
Examples
Pricing
HELP
+ Create Poll
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Examples
Pricing
HELP
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Create a Poll
Giulia Afiune
follow
0
Giulia Afiune
Settings
Promote Poll
follow
0
Create Poll
This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide if the University of Texas at Austin's admission process is unfairly favoring candidates of racial minorities in its admission process. Abigail Fisher, who was rejected from UT-Austin in 2008, sued the school, saying she was unfavored because she is white. 75 percent of the University's incoming freshmen are admitted because they were top students in a public high school, and the remaining 25% are admitted through a review process that considers race, SAT scores and other factors. A ruling against UT-Austin could be used as an argument to eliminate affirmative action — the practice of giving minorities, especially Hispanics and blacks, a modest boost in admissions – in universities across the country. If you were a Supreme Court justice in this case, how would you rule? #You'rethejudge
Against UT-Austin because college admissions should be based on academic achievement, not race.
For UT-Austin because affirmative actions are necessary to correct historical school segregation.
Against UT-Austin because giving 75% of vacancies to top students from public high schools guarantees that qualified minority students will be selected.
For UT-Austin because the opposite decision could jeopardize affirmative action in schools throughout the country.
Share my opinion
Results
Share
Embed
Set the width
and height
Copy the code below to your page:
Giulia Afiune: This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide if the University of Texas at Austin's admission process is unfairly favoring candidates of racial minorities in its admission process. Abigail Fisher, who was rejected from UT-Austin in 2008, sued the school, saying she was unfavored because she is white. 75 percent of the University's incoming freshmen are admitted because they were top students in a public high school, and the remaining 25% are admitted through a review process that considers race, SAT scores and other factors. A ruling against UT-Austin could be used as an argument to eliminate affirmative action — the practice of giving minorities, especially Hispanics and blacks, a modest boost in admissions – in universities across the country. If you were a Supreme Court justice in this case, how would you rule? #You'rethejudge
created by
Poll
Poll
Results
Use Poll in Facebook Messenger:
Click here to share poll on specific pages, user profiles or purchase votes!
Popular:
Recent:
Please like this
Only fans of
can vote, "like" it here:
or go to the page, like it and submit your vote again