What is your most used strategy of doing dialogic pedagogy in a conventional monologic institution? Please elaborate your answer in a comment

a. "Just do it": Secretly smuggling dialogic pedagogy without telling anybody.

b. Trying to engage my administration and my colleagues into critical dialogue about education and convince them about the PROs of dialogic pedagogy and values of pedagogical experimentation for promoting quality of education.

c. Trying to practice dialogic pedagogy within legitimate boundaries of my monologic conventional institution.

d. Trying to build a small group of my colleagues within and/or out of my monologic institution, interested in dialogic pedagogy and/or pedagogical innovations and experimentation for supporting and protecting ourselves and building ideas.

e. Searching for an institution that might tolerate my dialogic pedagogy and my pedagogical experimentation.

f. Trying to find powerful institutional protector who supports and defends my dialogic pedagogy and pedagogical innovations.

g. Playing lottery to win a lot of money to open my own dialogic pedagogy educational institution.

h. Starting a dialogic pedagogy school with like-minded people.

i. Starting a political campaign for democratization of education.

j. Lobbying influential politicians for more educational policies favorable for dialogic pedagogy and pedagogical innovation. .

k. Moving to an "educational periphery" of my monologic conventional institution where my dialogic pedagogy and experimentation is less visible and/or important for the institution (e.g., teaching art).

l. Other (please describe).

m. I'm not publicly talking about this. Common guys, this is a very dangerous question to ask (me and some other folks!)!

n. Fortunately for me, I don't need to deal with this issue because I don't work in a monologic educational institution! :-) But I feel sorry for you... :-(