Should a person have unlimited healthcare treatment regarless of the ultimate cost and should the Federal government pay it?

Question

Should a person have unlimited healthcare treatment regarless of the ultimate cost and should the Federal government pay it?

Other

Results Share Embed

Poll Results

Use Poll in Facebook Messenger:

Click here to share poll on specific pages, user profiles or purchase votes!

Answer 1

Yes, and the Federal Government should pay it all. (Translation: All Taxpayers which is

Answer 2

Yes, but it should be limited to only life-threatening treatment (catastrophic care) and the individual pays the rest

Answer 3

No, all subsidies, taxes, etc. should be paid through State Level programs (ie. State Taxpayers pay for it through sales tax, property, refunds from Governtment etc.) including Medicare being dismantled and those monies given to the State.

Answer 4

No, return the money and let communities and doctors/hospitals setup "direct to public" plans (ie. no more insurance companies. Charities will help the poor.

Answer 5

No, it should be the responsibility of the individual patient and his/her contracted healthplan from whatever is available. Keep Federal Govt out including abolishing Medicare and returning the money to the people.

Bob Collins

Should a person have unlimited healthcare treatment regarless of the ultimate cost and should the Federal government pay it?

Popular:

Recent:

Bob Collins

Should a person have unlimited healthcare treatment regarless of the ultimate cost and should the Federal government pay it?

Popular:

Recent:

Please like this