+ Create Poll
Examples
Pricing
HELP
+ Create Poll
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Examples
Pricing
HELP
All my polls
Become a Premium Voter
Followers
GDPR compliance
Logout
Create a Poll
Slobarcco Polls
follow
1
Slobarcco Polls
Settings
Promote Poll
follow
1
 
Create Poll
Do you think that the absence of the genitals on the most of the dolls for kids (Barbie dolls and similar) is justified?
Is this question for real?!
No, kids should be taught the way they were made.
Yes, even the thought of kids touching these genitals is disgusting to me.
No, dolls are not made for kids only.
Yes, kids should decide later on themselves on what sex they want to have.
No, that is a very natural thing that is owned by kids themselves.
Yes, it is forbidden by law.
No, the absence of the dolls’ genitals erases real difference and imposes unnatural, capitalistic differences (make-up, clothes…).
I do not know. It is important that kids become good people, what cannot be influenced by toys.
I do not think of that, although I do not see the purpose of dolls’ genitals, since dolls cannot reproduce.
We all know what such toys are made for!
Please add your opinion
Share my opinion
Tags:
dolls
gender
hobbies
people
sex
Results
Share
Embed
Set the width
and height
Copy the code below to your page:
Slobarcco Polls: Do you think that the absence of the genitals on the most of the dolls for kids (Barbie dolls and similar) is justified?
created by
Poll
Poll
Results
Use Poll in Facebook Messenger:
Click here to share poll on specific pages, user profiles or purchase votes!
Popular:
Recent:
Please like this
Only fans of
can vote, "like" it here:
or go to the page, like it and submit your vote again