If I had an opportunity, I would choose to go for….. (you can choose more than one!)
by Wildopia
In a Facebook poll of 227 respondents, 24.2% chose “Locations with good wildlife opportunities (Some accommodation establishments are located in close proximity to wildlife-rich habitat)”. How we count
Locations with good wildlife opportunities (Some accommodation establishments are located in close proximity to wildlife-rich habitat)
24.2%55
Habitat specific tours (Such tours are based on a habitat rich in wildlife and accessed by a specialised vehicle)
21.1%48
Nature-based tourism with wildlife component (Showing wildlife as a key but incidental part of the product)
20.3%46
Thrill-offering tours (Exhibition of a dangerous or large species (such as huskies) enticed to engage in spectacular behaviour in the wild by the operator)
14.1%32
Specialist animal watching (Such tours cater for specialist interests in a species or group of species (such as bird watching!)
11%25
Hunting / Fishing tours (Consumptive use of wildlife may be in natural habitat, semi-captive or farmed conditions)
7%16
Artificial attractions based on wildlife (Wildlife species form the basis of attraction where the species are kept in captivity, and may even be trained)
2.2%5
Camping trips in nature parks
0%0
NIL unless no wildlife is impacted in the process which is kinda impossible when humans want to see wildlife.
0%0
NONE unless no wildlife is impacted in the process which is kinda impossible when humans want to see wildlife.
0%0
Share: ···